qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Ross <jr...@apache.org>
Subject Re: AMQP 1.0 connection property names
Date Tue, 13 May 2014 16:59:57 GMT
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:
> My only comment around the actual names is that 'process' doesnt
>> immediately make me think 'name' and even seems a little like it could be
>> describing the same thing as 'pid' if you didnt know both properties
>> existed, which I have always thought about the older versions too. That
>> isn't to say I necessarily have a good alternative suggestion, the only
>> short one I could think of was 'pname' :)
> How about process_name and process_id then?

I like those.  I don't think brevity is important in this case, and those
names are very clear to me.

Out of curiosity, is there any interest in offering the command line (a la
"process_command_line")?  The arguments passed to a process can often be
used to distinguish it from others quickly.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message