Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D50A10E08 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20627 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2013 12:58:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 20448 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2013 12:58:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 20440 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2013 12:58:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:58:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tross@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:58:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9BCveFX016900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:57:40 -0400 Received: from dhcp-185-165.bos.redhat.com (wlan-196-30.bos.redhat.com [10.16.196.30]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9BCvdHv011864 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:57:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5257F5C3.7060706@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:57:39 -0400 From: Ted Ross User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router component References: <525574AE.6050008@redhat.com> <52558D29.8010108@redhat.com> <5256AD3A.7020904@redhat.com> <5257CAE2.9090605@redhat.com> <5257DEC0.5060201@redhat.com> <5257E101.8080601@redhat.com> <5257EFE6.8020203@redhat.com> <5257F37D.3050806@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5257F37D.3050806@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/11/2013 08:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 10/11/2013 01:32 PM, Ted Ross wrote: >> I have no love for the name. But it has to be called *something* :) > > Indeed, and I reiterate how hard good naming is. > > Assuming 'Qpid Router' is undesirable as either making to big a claim > (there will never be any other Qpid thing that routes) or provides > insufficient 'identity', one option might be to follow the elementary > particles approach started with proton. How about 'gluon' or perhaps > 'graviton'? :-) > > I personally think a simple DX or QDX as an opaque name would be > better as it more obviously acknowledges that its merely an identifier > with little or no underlying description. QDX is actually pretty good. If we made that change, it wouldn't require significant file edits. > > Again, this should in no way imply any opposition to proceeding as is. > It is just an observation/suggestion. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org