qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Ross <tr...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Qpid Dispatch Router component
Date Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:57:39 GMT

On 10/11/2013 08:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 01:32 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
>> I have no love for the name.  But it has to be called *something* :)
>
> Indeed, and I reiterate how hard good naming is.
>
> Assuming 'Qpid Router' is undesirable as either making to big a claim 
> (there will never be any other Qpid thing that routes) or provides 
> insufficient 'identity', one option might be to follow the elementary 
> particles approach started with proton. How about 'gluon' or perhaps 
> 'graviton'? :-)
>
> I personally think a simple DX or QDX as an opaque name would be 
> better as it more obviously acknowledges that its merely an identifier 
> with little or no underlying description.

QDX is actually pretty good.  If we made that change, it wouldn't 
require significant file edits.

>
> Again, this should in no way imply any opposition to proceeding as is. 
> It is just an observation/suggestion.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message