qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.24 release update - proposed final RC3
Date Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:31:50 GMT
For files written by us, the files themselves should be licenced.

I'm not aware of any allowance for 'short form' (other than perhaps the
link to the URL that is used for the 'Licence' field in things like
manifest files, though as they are usually generated they dont strictly
need licences), but it is perhaps worth asking someone who might be (e.g
legal@).

http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-licence.html

Note also the no-copyright-notice discussion, I see the standalone licence
file you mentioned also has a copyright statement in it.

Robbie

On 23 August 2013 15:08, Fraser Adams <fraser.adams@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> Re my ones:
>
> qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/**README-Java-Broker.txt
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/authentication/**
> account.properties
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/index.html
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie6.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie7.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie8.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie9.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**itablet.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/**iscroll.js
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/**jquery.js
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/index.**css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/qmf.**css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/ui/config.js
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/ui/qmf.html
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/src/**restapi/java/org/apache/qpid/**
> restapi/servlet/TODO
>
>
> Certainly for
>
>
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie6.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie7.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie8.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**
> itablet-ie9.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**itablet.css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/**iscroll.js
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/**jquery.js
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/index.**css
>   qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/qmf.**css
>
> There's a licence file in the parent directories e.g.
>
> qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/**qpid-web/web/itablet/css/**LICENCE
>
> That refers to files therein
>
> I wasn't wildly keen to bloat up css/js/html files that get served, though
> to be
> fair some of the JavaScript files are pretty big and have loads of
> comments so its
> a bit moot for them. Is it good enough just to include a licence reference
> e.g.
>
> /**
>  * http://www.apache.org/**licenses/LICENSE-2.0<http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>
>  */
>
> If it is that would seem a fair middle ground
>
>
>
> On 23/08/13 14:51, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
>> As Rob mentioned in his comment on QPID-4961, I noticed there are a number
>> of new unlicenced files (various xml, html, css, js, md, java files
>> primarily) spread across the tree that dont have licences and seem like
>> they need to:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~**robbie/qpid/0.24/0.24rc3_rat_**output.txt<http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.24/0.24rc3_rat_output.txt>
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 23 August 2013 12:41, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  I have staged the maven artifacts, they are available at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapacheqpid-110<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-110>
>>>
>>> I gave the release archives for the java broker and clients a quick try
>>> out together using the hello world examples, and also declared
>>> dependencies
>>> on the key maven artifacts in a test project to ensure the expected
>>> dependency artifacts got picked up.
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>> On 21 August 2013 23:38, Justin Ross <jross@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi, folks.  RC3 is now available.
>>>>
>>>>    http://people.apache.org/~**jross/qpid-0.24-rc3/<http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.24-rc3/>
>>>>
>>>> This RC is signed and ready for promotion to GA.  Supposing we don't
>>>> find any new critical issues, I will start the release vote on Friday.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 0.24 release page:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/qpid/0.24+**Release<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/0.24+Release>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message