qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Creating a queue and bindings from an address in qpid.messaging / AMQP 1.0
Date Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:29:33 GMT
On 08/08/2013 04:09 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> Sure, why not. Currently we also don't have any named subscriptions based
> on user ID with 0.10 - only named queues and we never had a problem with it.
>
> In the ATTACH command, the client sends only the link name from the
> address. Can't we leave the link names as they are right now (i.e.
> container-id + link name), but name the queue only by the link name and
> leave the container id out of it? The queue names are well protected by
> existing ACL rules and every user can easily specify it in the address. The
> problem with the uniqueness of the queue name will be left to the user, but
> that will be not different from creating the queues from the address in
> AMQP 0.10.

My concern there is that from an AMQP 1.0 perspective it is entirely 
legal to use the same link name with a different container-id and for 
those uses not to interfere with each other.

> Regards
> Jakub
>
> PS: I tried to connect twice a client with the same container ID & link
> name ... the client gets exception about exclusive queue which already has
> an consumer. But what is more important, the broker crashes. I guess I can
> enter another JIRA ...

Oops, yes please!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message