Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8548B10805 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74064 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2013 16:58:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 73436 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2013 16:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 72883 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2013 16:58:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:58:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aconway@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:58:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JGwCXo021177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:58:12 -0400 Received: from [10.10.55.179] (vpn-55-179.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.55.179]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5JGwBJn003921; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:58:11 -0400 Message-ID: <51C1E323.6040106@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:58:11 -0400 From: Alan Conway Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@qpid.apache.org CC: Andrew Stitcher , qpid users Subject: Re: C++ Broker use of "--port 0" option References: <1371508950.6030.6.camel@pansy> In-Reply-To: <1371508950.6030.6.camel@pansy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On 06/17/2013 06:42 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > I've just opened QPID-4931[1] and a code review [2] to change the > behaviour of the --port 0 command line option to the C++ broker. > > Essentially if you use this option after the change the broker will only > listen to a single address and you will need to use --interface to > select the address you require. > > This option is only really useful for testing purposes and so I don't > expect this to have very much impact, but please do speak up if you use > this option for some purpose that I can't imagine and will be affected > by this change. > > Note that in the future I'd like to entirely get rid of this option and > replace its uses with the --socket-fd option and the work that Alan has > done [3]. > > I'd like to get this in for 0.24 so speak up soon. > > Thanks > > Andrew > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4931 > [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/11915/ > [3] https://reviews.apache.org/r/10872/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org