Return-Path: 
 <users-return-7833-apmail-qpid-users-archive=qpid.apache.org@qpid.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B144EDD7A
	for <apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sat,  9 Mar 2013 19:26:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 99485 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2013 19:26:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org
Received: (qmail 99462 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2013 19:26:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@qpid.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@qpid.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.qpid.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org
Received: (qmail 99449 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2013 19:26:34 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:26:34 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com)
 (209.85.214.177)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:26:29 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id eh20so2194049obb.22
        for <users@qpid.apache.org>; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:26:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=C4o58f7r0UqCZKta4TlG6c+eogPT3qwy2T1NfJO2xi0=;
        b=umtKYnIJzpmiMzx1ogGiOvo2i2kJwlnrctKjJ/hzIeColG1J57/v08NCB5HFGA6jQG
         rYMJhgPp1qehgGH710ZKf904nVz37A0P3gbSmXLEW4TBAETyXB6N/VlZCjOzfsfJDvSW
         QeEK83AoJE8K/q/KuX5ZZf5SpsZP2/gOjaiHUaJjkXn4N5gArRwkpV4dLAcEL19V5/K7
         yr18DygmZVka1ymXLMlWRYePaekU2XYmJcLhJhNKfvQ43t1oWqlSH5ydz8ABUYgtut8f
         5Y/Kxn+dsKcx1jhZK12SPoehFo9hFxwW5JHvzpdqcbQz2ULvXAPYqmaLOiaokanzERq1
         EqqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.64.74 with SMTP id m10mr5034772obs.61.1362857168471;
 Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.22.194 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:26:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFitrpT0mcjPYHhNUEvX8Nnv=V9LtFJU3KCA4ck=M0yZrGjt7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <513B4EB7.6070007@blueyonder.co.uk>
	<CACsaS96wBbpfjSg2PuViHBPa78xArgufpP4WuKQi0K6K-YLj+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<513B6391.6040105@blueyonder.co.uk>
	<CACsaS95bicn5UQOROevJ8+0_4Tp3yd_=JDEgnSgjZDjtMq80Aw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFitrpT0mcjPYHhNUEvX8Nnv=V9LtFJU3KCA4ck=M0yZrGjt7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 20:26:08 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CACsaS96RRcHHSN0j65FYkZWwt0_nJm+VVjxQXxFu7D48kxG8mA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Java broker exchange questions
From: Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 9 March 2013 20:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 March 2013 16:46, Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com> wrote:
> <snip>
>
>> The larger task I would like to undertake is to make it possible to
>> just drop in jars containing new Exchange / Queue types in a pluggable
>> manner.
>>
>>
> That is actually already supported on trunk for Exchange types, and is how
> even the base Exchange types from the prior AMQP specs are now loaded (we
> enforce that the base types are present though).

Ah yes - I think you mentioned that to me... but it slipped my mind :)
  That is a huge improvement!

>
> Queues are not loaded in the same way yet as that was definitely a larger
> task calling for more of a rewrite in order to implement.

Yeah - from an AMQP 1.0 point of view one might consider Queues and
Exchanges both as types of "Nodes" (the 1.0 transport for the Java
Broker actually allows you to publish directly to Queues and subscribe
to Exchanges)... how to present this and the 0.x view as a single
coherent model will be "interesting" (are bindings links from
exchanges to queues I wonder)

-- Rob (going seriously off-topic)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org