Return-Path: 
 <users-return-7069-apmail-qpid-users-archive=qpid.apache.org@qpid.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38015D52B
	for <apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 62150 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 06:32:28 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61755 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 06:32:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@qpid.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@qpid.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.qpid.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61718 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2012 06:32:21 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:32:21 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.220.42] (HELO mail-pa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.220.42)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:32:15 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fa1so3787217pad.15
        for <users@qpid.apache.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=EGBmqbOD+qJw4A4RVoPLK7tJO3QBBBkNE/YNiNoxA8w=;
        b=IlEiu1iwWDunR1CTZG8nWupDsjm2zsTJw8RWGlI7Kf1lczgcSIBtZkBn91GZ3NG/Fp
         nki1/Kk20dWdfuKvJq7ArQ/V5xcZI5uEh8A/GeFFwh9tB2+M+7E5eKz5Adg2xolZ7sOv
         8v2yV8XfIVXxZULpPLEl2ellRF65is7Y7GsWQTo7psO5jUKmP7t6Sd0A/EHanEhyor66
         2WFt01v+TDCG2BT+blo2frsVGfjleMaB8KExsW2rbvDXj4ruPz29367v2kkJ2zrTozIV
         ogoes1o8FHj1wzJhCCtzFVk/gQn0lmCEA4+yzva4u1XHc2JXpyhwYiJ4Trb1LQ9KcbHp
         dfwA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.195.195 with SMTP id ig3mr34862189pbc.108.1350282713923;
 Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.146.162 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <636049982.11500482.1350050894594.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
References: 
 <CAK76X7SA43=AVFUtTsXZ4Ke3mdnh0CS9m3F6k_Aj+wZnr2nVWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<636049982.11500482.1350050894594.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:01:53 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAK76X7QdopsjeZWHfaVvk6d4QTw2DaxJUmh5nCq=BuieRaQdww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: active-passive cluster
From: Terance Dias <terance@socialtwist.com>
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10d18782804c04cc1331b3
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQkUeQ/GWxrPYIN+xpf/FpqlUG/FtjX3F0gM1UCqpY6JejxixnrYaT+KcLXQreSstQafu78Z
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--047d7b10d18782804c04cc1331b3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks a lot for your reply Pavel.

Below is my cluster.conf file.
-------------------------------------------
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!--
This is an example of a cluster.conf file to run qpidd HA under rgmanager.

NOTE: fencing is not shown, you must configure fencing appropriately for
your cluster.
-->

<cluster name="test-qpid-cluster" config_version="18">
  <!-- The cluster has 2 nodes. Each has a unique nodid and one vote
       for quorum. -->
  <clusternodes>
    <clusternode name="ec2-node-1.amazonaws.com" nodeid="1"/>
    <clusternode name="ec2-node-2.amazonaws.com" nodeid="2"/>
  </clusternodes>
  <cman two_node="1" expected_votes="1">
  </cman>
  <!-- Resouce Manager configuration. -->
  <rm>
    <!--
        There is a failoverdomain for each node containing just that node.
        This lets us stipulate that the qpidd service should always run on
each node.
    -->
    <failoverdomains>
      <failoverdomain name="east-domain" restricted="1">
        <failoverdomainnode name="ec2-node-1.amazonaws.com"/>
      </failoverdomain>
      <failoverdomain name="west-domain" restricted="1">
        <failoverdomainnode name="ec2-node-2.amazonaws.com"/>
      </failoverdomain>
    </failoverdomains>

    <resources>
      <!-- This script starts a qpidd broker acting as a backup. -->
      <script file="/usr/local/etc/init.d/qpidd" name="qpidd"/>

      <!-- This script promotes the qpidd broker on this node to primary.
-->
      <script file="/usr/local/etc/init.d/qpidd-primary"
name="qpidd-primary"/>
    </resources>

    <!-- There is a qpidd service on each node, it should be restarted if
it fails. -->
    <service name="east-qpidd-service" domain="east-domain"
recovery="restart">
      <script ref="qpidd"/>
    </service>
    <service name="west-qpidd-service" domain="west-domain"
recovery="restart">
      <script ref="qpidd"/>
    </service>

    <!-- There should always be a single qpidd-primary service, it can run
on any node. -->
    <service name="qpidd-primary-service" autostart="1" exclusive="0"
recovery="relocate">
      <script ref="qpidd-primary"/>
    </service>
  </rm>
</cluster>
----------------------------------------------

The exact message I get when I start cman service is :

---------------------------------------------

Starting cluster:
   Checking Network Manager... [  OK  ]
   Global setup... [  OK  ]
   Loading kernel modules... [  OK  ]
   Mounting configfs... [  OK  ]
   Starting cman... Cannot find node name in cluster.conf
Unable to get the configuration
Cannot find node name in cluster.conf
cman_tool: corosync daemon didn't start

-------------------------------------------------

Thanks,
Terance.


On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Terance,
> could you paste here your cluster.conf file?
>
> (I know I had the same issue some time ago, since I specify the hostname
> in /etc/hosts I dont have problems further - but that may be irrelevant).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Terance Dias" <terance@socialtwist.com>
> > To: users@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:49:47 PM
> > Subject: active-passive cluster
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using qpid trunk code and trying to set up the active-passive
> > cluster
> > mentioned at
> >
> http://qpid.apache.org/books/trunk/AMQP-Messaging-Broker-CPP-Book/html/chap-Messaging_User_Guide-Active_Passive_Cluster.html
> .
> > I'm having some trouble setting up cman and rpmanager 2 node cluster
> > on
> > our Ubuntu-11.4 64 bit servers. Has anybody successfully set up this
> > cluster on Ubuntu? It would be great if you could share some kind of
> > resource or document that explains how this can be done. Right now if
> > I
> > start cman I get an error saying "Starting cman... Cannot find node
> > name in
> > cluster.conf" . The node names mentioned in my cluster.conf file is
> > accessible through DNS lookup and I've opened the following ports
> > between
> > my servers.
> >
> > TCP - 41966,41967,41968,41969,50006,50008,50009,21064
> > UPD - 50007,5404,5405
> >
> > I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Terance.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>

--047d7b10d18782804c04cc1331b3--