qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carl Trieloff <cctriel...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: proposal to remove certain features from qpidd
Date Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:20:46 GMT
On 07/23/2012 07:40 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> Yes, the use of flow-to-disk queues unfortunately doesn't solve the
> memory issue on 100%. It just decreases the memory consumption, so the
> point when the broker runs out of memory is postponed a bit.
>
>

we actually need 'real' flow to disk queue here.

Would a queue type that does not allow browsing for example, but flushes
everything to disk and only supports FIFO cover your use case.  Issue is
when you flush everything to disk, any non FIFO operation becomes very
expensive

Carl.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message