Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 277679C47 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6017 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2011 12:46:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 5985 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2011 12:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 5977 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2011 12:46:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:46:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asuryaprakash525@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.170] (HELO mail-gx0-f170.google.com) (209.85.161.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:45:59 +0000 Received: by ggnk1 with SMTP id k1so5651100ggn.15 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=GhlQpUfWHF2YtIdGefdDSIuurKrNA5NR9bPpSuGW5QY=; b=k5OCiVO8wx4A51WqQsv2VmzxuVYXAawbjLNCFrzuIYhr8nJCEuu778Lh4tXJh6NlXi NPKdepLcNxIrkNuEjuuUPfx87irJPfLTVceWlMtbKjwFdfeFTc3LoNWPtEGjIQt9uF7q GXb+C5isvuWJcWh9SbzpG/wfmZXpRwCM27dNw= Received: by 10.223.7.14 with SMTP id b14mr13770683fab.10.1318337138102; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:45:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.5.16 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:45:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E94395A.2090702@redhat.com> References: <4E94395A.2090702@redhat.com> From: surya prakash Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:15:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with qpid receiving To: users@qpid.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517473782cf910004af054883 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517473782cf910004af054883 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If i use ACCEPT_MODE_EXPLICIT then i am getting duplicate entry's that's the reason i user ACCEPT_MODE_NONE On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 10/11/2011 01:36 PM, surya prakash wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i used 2 programs one for sending simple data like "Test and some >> unique id" and one for receiving. >> when receiving i used >> SubscriptionSettings >> SubsSetting(FlowControl::**unlimited(),ACCEPT_MODE_NONE,** >> ACQUIRE_MODE_PRE_ACQUIRED,1,**COMPLETE_ON_ACCEPT); >> > > ACCEPT_MODE_NONE means messages are not acknowledged but are assumed > delivered as soon as the broker sends them out. This is inherently > unreliable and will result in any in-flight messages being lost in the event > of a crash. > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.**apache.org > > -- ** *Thanks and Regards,* *A.SURYA PRAKASH REDDY* ***Ph.No:+91 7676724614* --001517473782cf910004af054883--