Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pmoravec@redhat.com
 designates 209.132.183.24 as permitted sender)
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com>
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Priority queues with JMS Client/ Java Broker
Message-ID: 
 <16219a11-1cb3-44a2-ac24-05fd3831bc7c@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E8C5D12.6050605@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0

> From: "Alan Conway" <aconway@redhat.com>
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: "Pavel Moravec" <pmoravec@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 3:35:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Priority queues with JMS Client/ Java Broker
> 
> On 09/27/2011 03:37 AM, Pavel Moravec wrote:
> > Hi Praveen and all,
> > just an additional info to prevent some confusion if you wish to
> > use browse mode: priorities work when consuming the messages,
> > while when browsing the queue, messages are ordered based on their
> > enqueueing time. I.e. when sending messages:
> >
> > - first with priority 2
> > - then with priority 1
> > - latest with priority 3
> >
> > then browsing the queue shows messages in ordering "priority 2",
> > "priority 1", "priority 3" message.
> > While consuming messages consumes them in ordering "priority 3",
> > "priority 2", "priority 1" message.
> >
> 
> That sounds like a bug to me. Is it intentional?

I think so - I discussed it with somebody (Gordon?). At present it is intentional as the change would not be trivial afaik.

Kind regards,
Pavel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org