From users-return-3733-apmail-qpid-users-archive=qpid.apache.org@qpid.apache.org Wed Feb 02 00:06:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16897 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 00:06:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 00:06:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 74993 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 00:06:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 74740 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 00:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 74724 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 00:06:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,FSL_RU_URL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrewinternational@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.52] (HELO mail-ww0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:06:34 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so7741329wwd.33 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:06:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject :date:to:x-mailer; bh=B79Z5RHAF7/0OBxQLwIAjXG4i42QiB2nk5EmUf8dD/o=; b=q2b1XqTHR0umH0ojrmxaJGpYfGlzkB4jxhYWpK6JcaL62oIBjdL8Pv2pl2Y6ZKnqza kYjbwBsYvR63Ywjp2KJ0pNP/WXrrv36yX1PvAkaT5jqtnsqB1Zl84IKSvtuMkQmfS5iV +4VqU/lA1htb59/MiV/stNGm9PrBHxW800mNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=nnw2gYYDEjHh6Ir/DFUtiVtsyOfxJgI5qhmtVGgnRYmCL1zzKcVz/y9ZMbuMVIZbe9 o0sYvEsLYxxcVuvH2NKl4j7Hz4U/WFvFDZFFI7h7eK94D+AGkSFI0aGbmU7SE4rdCo0E vOjGLRSEsJZsWGvM/B1O47Mi0bBx5gDtXLPwg= Received: by 10.216.25.136 with SMTP id z8mr1212975wez.93.1296605172070; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:06:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [92.40.19.207] (92.40.19.207.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.19.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a50sm10236258wer.18.2011.02.01.16.06.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:06:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <908E78ED-9DB0-4DB3-81C6-956AEC021EE5@gmail.com> Cc: dev@qpid.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrew Kennedy Subject: Re: OSGi version for Java? Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:04:04 +0000 To: users@qpid.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Hi. Full OSGi modularisation of the Qpid broker is one of the projects I am working on. I want to allow the broker to be embedded in Equinox or Felix etc. Watch this space for more details and timescales, but it should be coming soon. Though, bear in mind it isn't officially scheduled as part of any of the upcoming release versions - yet... I do have an experimental build which I am testing that does some of this already and I think it's an important feature. Andrew. -- -- andrew d kennedy ? do not fold, bend, spindle, or mutilate ; -- http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ? edinburgh : +44 7582 293 255 ; On 28 Jan 2011, at 12:54, Pete Carapetyan wrote: > Thanks Sergey, I'm running both client and broker, but this gets me > one step > closer. > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:48 AM, > wrote: > >> >> Pete, if you need only client to be OSGi-fied take a look here >> >> >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/ >> org.apache.servicemix.bundles.qpid/0.8.0_1/ >> >> The following feature for the Apache Karaf should work just fine >> (please >> let me know if not): >> >> >> >> mvn:edu.emory.mathcs.backport/ >> com.springsource.edu.emory.mathcs.backport/2.2.0 >> >> >> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/ >> org.apache.servicemix.bundles.mina/1.1.7_4 >> >> >> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/ >> org.apache.servicemix.bundles.qpid/0.8.0_1 >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Sergey Zhemzhitsky >> >> >> >> *Pete Carapetyan * >> Sent by: pete.carapetyan@gmail.com >> >> 28.01.2011 05:12 >> Please respond to >> users@qpid.apache.org >> >> To >> users@qpid.apache.org >> cc >> Subject >> OSGi version for Java? >> >> >> >> >> I'm using qpid broker and client in an OSGi application. >> >> Few questions regarding this issue: >> >> Is there any demand for qpid in an OSGi version other than my own >> needs? >> Has anyone else worked on such an issue? >> If I worked on this are there any bundles which should be >> optional? How >> would one discern them? >> Is there a release coming soon that I should wait for before doing >> a stale >> release and having to redo it? >> >> It is odd that none of the jars included with either the client or >> broker >> appear to be OSGi bundles, but the lib directory of the broker >> includes the >> felix OSGi framework? >> >> Most but not all of the external jars found in the broker are already >> available in OSGi ready releases, so the effort required to >> accomplish this >> work would be limited. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org