qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: QPID Clustering
Date Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:24:22 GMT
On 02/28/2011 10:58 AM, Sergey_Zhemzhitsky@troika.ru wrote:
> Hi Alan, thanks for support
>>> I'm not familiar with stonish.
> Sorry for mistyping, I have meant stonith.
> So, does it make sense to use cman instead of corosync in case of two-node
> cluster? Are there any benefits in using cman?

CMAN is in addition to corosync, not instead of it.

You need CMAN to handle split-brain network partitions. In a partition, CMAN is 
used to determine which partition has quorum, and shuts down the other 
partition. If you use qpidd --cluster-cman then qpidd will shut itself down if 
it loses quorum. You can also use fencing to shut down the inquorate hosts.

Without cman, a split-brain partition will create two isolated qpid clusters, 
which will fail when the partition is removed.

Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org

View raw message