Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10730 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2011 02:12:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2011 02:12:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 86888 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 02:12:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 86810 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 02:12:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 86802 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2011 02:12:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:12:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pete.carapetyan@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.42] (HELO mail-fx0-f42.google.com) (209.85.161.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:11:55 +0000 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3824062fxm.15 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:11:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1i6UJgX2RGYTRDnfUe1VgB3fWfDc9Q7wht0sN1iOijg=; b=aPiM+t4mVhTzXsAdT+Z1YtCEOH03u/A8W4ScUgLH8FkAy6G5ChBz+JbgBtyAjtq0Ch +4Qa8e+9K/8/PLHqpkprhueC4FGDjyuEbtnJP9Psir/oJ1RXWBTrqFB0jIDZr33KeZr1 bzjwSdadBXiWPKxwo6zNjI6uF5COJPzXZaF0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=G9NvxY0IIY+rxJ2AhLqa/Zg15T2XD0Cc7JlMyrYBy+gBv/2OCDiYTV29INUTAkQVex QhnmgsrsK0DE29LKzTzc2FrviJrJHgne1cGb2WtnWYPGR+K9evZE3lRWoP9bbM5gmFRM 0iMXjm3/KRLhrpx4slEzquE8/tQMj4Dh/8poA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.114.135 with SMTP id e7mr1721075faq.78.1296180695350; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:11:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: pete.carapetyan@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.102.144 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:11:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:11:35 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JGZMBm2l73eRzxCt3ZwzrkfroZo Message-ID: Subject: OSGi version for Java? From: Pete Carapetyan To: users@qpid.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ae01e93f19049ade95d3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5ae01e93f19049ade95d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm using qpid broker and client in an OSGi application. Few questions regarding this issue: Is there any demand for qpid in an OSGi version other than my own needs? Has anyone else worked on such an issue? If I worked on this are there any bundles which should be optional? How would one discern them? Is there a release coming soon that I should wait for before doing a stale release and having to redo it? It is odd that none of the jars included with either the client or broker appear to be OSGi bundles, but the lib directory of the broker includes the felix OSGi framework? Most but not all of the external jars found in the broker are already available in OSGi ready releases, so the effort required to accomplish this work would be limited. --001636c5ae01e93f19049ade95d3--