Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4073 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 14:17:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2011 14:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 58735 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 14:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 58322 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 14:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 58314 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2011 14:17:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:17:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aconway@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:17:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0JEH45F013099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:17:04 -0500 Received: from [10.11.10.112] (vpn-10-112.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.10.112]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0JEH4wZ027896 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:17:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4D36F25F.5010506@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:17:03 -0500 From: Alan Conway Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: qpid-tool knocks out cluster partner References: <4D262A71.6010001@redhat.com> <4D2B13B6.3060905@redhat.com> <4D35FDB1.1000102@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 On 01/18/2011 08:04 PM, Mark Moseley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alan Conway wrote: >> On 01/10/2011 09:12 AM, Alan Conway wrote: >>> >>> On 01/07/2011 07:55 PM, Mark Moseley wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Alan Conway wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 12/29/2010 02:11 PM, Mark Moseley wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This might be the same as >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2982 but in case it's not, >>>>>> I'm dropping this email. If I connect to qpid-tool on member A of a >>>>>> cluster and do just about anything, e.g. list binding, list exchange, >>>>>> etc, the other node, B, blows up. In the logs below, exp01==A and >>>>>> exp02==B. >>>>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> I've commented on that JIRA. I hope my info is useful. It's getting >>>> kind of convoluted :) >>> >>> Thanks, I'll try it out and see if I can reproduce it. It will be very >>> helpful >>> if I can. >>> >> >> I believe I've fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2982 on >> trunk r1060568. Can you give it a spin and let me know how it goes? > > Just started testing a little while ago but so far I haven't seen a > single crash yet using the same steps I posted in the JIRA, so it > looks pretty good so far. I'll post again if I see any crashes. > That's good. Can you also re-test 2992 and 2993? I think they may also be fixed by this patch. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org