Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76056 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 20:04:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 20:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 94695 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 20:04:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 94642 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 20:04:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 94634 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 20:04:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:04:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.207.197] (HELO web32404.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:04:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 23277 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Dec 2010 20:04:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291752269; bh=vDmPHc52V//4PryNYyQesP0DNS4SO9MwCIOHLaYjON8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h2MMuhkRctXBJHRnLJwBJj6QSw/cMuZ0lhlyJrF4l3ENsEQ/95yr3qUbG9+nfNW/DNnREZEt7KLeimaqHvR6nCOziGy9yJmk01gjRVTphCNEvNN5yemhisAb/zqBRMISJE0+CbRZ0BcI2jknTlRzElTqDQ8aRd45u2MOpmHWHU4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CZcr+zEkjuu2Evv6ht7IsfIuJ2ZRke3zTmLET0SJWz00/csZgiumDiL7EjTzhop3OJwqrLAmcTtmqWv06pga1OaY9rYldMeC7TiiWZ2Pi0oCRMvspY0SDzQP4vnD6jtetkHeX76GL6iUKP7k4WA5v+9Mcn1HHLCUlDHF17q04to=; Message-ID: <848822.22726.qm@web32404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: qcA.Ru8VM1l08hHwD.qw2EDHQG2YonwAIrY2t.AToD5UeMv NjJ4LTXHTD3g5jEw8lY.rw7.48CGQKWxFGTGUmVj3JcpjNVUeB_QBsxjj82Q EiorJ_7_EphxzSnrQuJwvhqPEqKU5wSulxP4bQteyENN5ARDEor8iBtFTKOB IfzUA92dLcCrcK4MDz0kYk0tiDWOMy2KPaFY1l0QlRycaIixicf1xke1gTxX LQP.vlcQUGH.3CWD32kgaYH1jMKGq_GCBpNBju2E.q4ZGoaLyN6elGjS3__Y byXS8edG.AMPeMT2zUN6g.8JfJqukKe9LkVe_5h8lkufoPQ-- Received: from [199.46.199.231] by web32404.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:04:29 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:04:29 -0800 (PST) From: Elizabeth Griffith Subject: JMS Dyname Ring Queues To: users@qpid.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1189219817-1291752269=:22726" --0-1189219817-1291752269=:22726 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I am upgrading my Java program from MRG 1.2 to MRG 1.3. I tried using the new addressing syntax to pick up the ability to create a dynamic queue as a ring queue. I made the queue non-durable with the auto-delete and exclusive flags. Before fail over, when I query the broker that I am going to fail over to, the dynamic ring queue appears on the queue list. However, when I fail over to it, the queue disappears. Most of the time JMS does not receive an exception that the queue does not exist so it does not know that it needs to recreate the queue. Therefore, it behaves as if it is connected, but it does not receive any messages. On rare occasions, an exception is received by JMS, which is passed on to my code. My code then recreates the queue. If I use the old syntax, the program fails over just fine. Is there something I might be missing in the addressing syntax that is preventing this from working correctly, or is there a race condition for JMS receiving an exception for the missing queue? Thanks, Liz --0-1189219817-1291752269=:22726--