Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33230 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 12:10:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 12:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 92119 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 12:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 92067 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 12:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 92057 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 12:10:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:10:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gsim@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:10:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5C9iMr023213 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:09:44 -0500 Received: from [10.11.9.230] (vpn-9-230.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.9.230]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5C9hcc011455 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:09:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF2C019.8040704@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:07:53 +0000 From: Gordon Sim Organization: Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.,Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903,Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David Owens (Ireland) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: How balance connections between two brokers References: <394f62fc0911041031l346cefd1r91993695bc3d8e32@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <394f62fc0911041031l346cefd1r91993695bc3d8e32@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.17 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/04/2009 06:31 PM, Rodrigo K. Ferreira wrote: > Hi, > > I'm planning to use Qpid for one solution, and now, I'm thinking about how > does the clients balance connections between more than one broker. Anyone > know that's possible ? > Any qpid/amq libs implement randon connects ? And any type of detection when > one broker server is down and begins to fail ? > > > My scenario is like that: > > --------------------------------- > ------------------------------------------------------ > | Pool of APP Servers | ----> | Pool of Qpid Brokers& Consumers | > > --------------------------------- > ------------------------------------------------------ > > My point is, I dont want use active/passive clusters. I read that > http://qpid.apache.org/starting-a-cluster.html , and that behavior is like > that. > My idea is to use all active brokers for receive messages that are produced > for my app pool. There isn't any built in mechanism as yet for doing this. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org