qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marnie McCormack <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Persistant Publish Subscribe mechanism in Qpid
Date Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:03:10 GMT
My view is that we recommend BDB, simply because we know that it performs
under heavy load. I'm not sure what kind of
robustness/performance/reliability tests have been run on Derby - anyone ?

Marnie

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com>wrote:

> 2009/10/13 Martin Ritchie <ritchiem@apache.org>:
>
> > There is some detail in our FAQ but I've updated our lt to include
> > links to the Derby Message Store for providing Apache Licensed
> > persistence and is bundled with the recent releases. The only cavet is
> > that it has not had as much reported testing.
>
> Just to clear for our users - are we recommending the Derby store or
> the BDB store for production use?
>
> RG
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message