Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74283 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2009 21:39:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2009 21:39:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 91848 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 21:39:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 91715 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 21:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 91704 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2009 21:39:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:39:22 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cctrieloff@redhat.com designates 66.187.237.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.187.237.31] (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:39:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GLcrlb016977 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:38:53 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1GLcsWa021006 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:38:54 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dhcp-100-19-90.bos.redhat.com [10.16.19.90]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GLcqxK018245 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:38:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4999DC22.2000303@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:30 -0500 From: Carl Trieloff Reply-To: cctrieloff@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Qman and Java Agents References: <4999D1A7.4040701@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4999D1A7.4040701@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, that is correct, QMan goes from QMF to JMX. The reverse mapping needs to be completed. Rafi and I have looked at it some & discussed.. want to help /contribute to it? Carl. Bryan Kearney wrote: > I was poking around the code, becuase I am interested in exposing an > EJB as a QMF Agent. In looking at the code, it appears that QMan is > more geard to exposing other agents to java code as JMX so as to build > JMX consoles. Is that correct? If so, has there been any work on > exposing Java Agents? > > -- bk > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org