Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86176 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2009 13:50:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2009 13:50:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 50198 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 13:50:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 49941 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 13:50:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 49919 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2009 13:50:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:50:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cctrieloff@redhat.com designates 66.187.237.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.187.237.31] (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:50:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GDo4IX016713; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:50:04 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1GDo4jl030625; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:50:05 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dhcp-100-19-90.bos.redhat.com [10.16.19.90]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GDo3pb019822; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:50:03 -0500 Message-ID: <49996E41.4020405@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:46:41 -0500 From: Carl Trieloff Reply-To: cctrieloff@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org, dev@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: QPid C++ broker & portability References: <1234731372369-2331415.post@n2.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1234731372369-2331415.post@n2.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ffrenchm wrote: > Hello, > > I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some bench)marks > and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID Java broker), the > results are very good. > > I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've some blocking > points. The first one is the portability on some platform such as AIX, HPUX > & HPUX-IA. I know that there is some tasks planned to make work QPID C++ > broker on sun platforms and I would like to know if there is other tasks > planned to make it work on AIX, HPUX, HPUXIA. Another question I have is > your estimation of the workload of this kind of task and what could be the > difficulties ??? > > Thanks for all > Thanks for the interest, Manuel has done quite a lot of work for Solaris, basically any post that uses posix is minimal work. Ports that are a bit further away need more intense effort like the Windows port. HP-UX and AIX I would think would be similar to solaris in effort (mostly just getting the compliers happy) - not being more than a few weeks work. The guys to hit up on the topic on the dev list would be Andrew & Steve, and possibly Alan Carl. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org