Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41077 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2009 13:32:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2009 13:32:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 25280 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2009 13:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 25266 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2009 13:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 25253 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2009 13:32:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:32:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cctrieloff@redhat.com designates 66.187.237.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.187.237.31] (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:32:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n16DWMQq005132 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:32:22 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n16DWLCq008497 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:32:22 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dhcp-100-19-90.bos.redhat.com [10.16.19.90]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n16DWLCm021669 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:32:21 -0500 Message-ID: <498C3B16.4010203@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:28:54 -0500 From: Carl Trieloff Reply-To: cctrieloff@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: About footprint size References: <1233898402793-2279278.post@n2.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1233898402793-2279278.post@n2.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org chenta wrote: > Hi, > I am curious about the footprint size of C++ client and broker. I can not > find the related info from the documents. > After I calculate the total object size of qpid/src/clinet and broker, the > total size is about 21 MB and 40 MB. Is it the right way/answer for this > question? > > B.R. > Chenta > For the broker, the memory footprint is determined more by your queue depth. The max size for the broker can be managed by using an external store and the flow-to-disk policies capping the max bytes allowed per queue, or size of messages before flowing the data to disk. So the short answer is, depends on how you wish to manage queue depth. Client will always be small, unless you increase the amount the client may buffer, by increasing the bound-multipler property. This controls how many frames the client may buffer before blocking the client user thread. Carl. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org