Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71059 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 51729 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 51716 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 51705 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:10:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of moseleymark@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.168] (HELO mail-bw0-f168.google.com) (209.85.218.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:03 +0000 Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so966836bwz.9 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:09:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XGI+pDjS492R8h4czBeJ8etBngNw7nP/Vti/0LxU2VI=; b=tTYnpzg/kHVOtcINvxeTJjXKgYL8No8XcSj7RHJ1x4vlqI1idI+0CFnzHUfBuzL0AC fiCQjyJnnepiaDrJu1b2mNTQ5bq7g5fPW58lk6sT87g36cgrGVA5DBEXASD9If68AN3B PwIUpNtn9xmAPlwCsVpgUAHOOjfAvKg7jLeBo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t8e12M8p0K2ybqS7xO22Qb2dIbrhWwJ2kuC0ietq1trKlsz0OWxmZPmusyMiQh4wpF ZCURdNhDrsea2Acr7V2Q0IMQ4MB/q01jtHgeiIysGFzmcP7VCMdTc3sY0PqCXO/dXijt PXVD+FYHO6M1JrbAXHSF7tWW/8Dnc/fs8SIT4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.239.8 with SMTP id m8mr576902bkh.165.1235005782875; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:09:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <294d5daa0902181654g5fe13a9ajc59cc78032347497@mail.gmail.com> References: <294d5daa0902181412p2b0ac4cby8efabe8e01d09b62@mail.gmail.com> <499C8C79.8050108@redhat.com> <294d5daa0902181654g5fe13a9ajc59cc78032347497@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:09:42 -0800 Message-ID: <294d5daa0902181709p4683605ai6f5af17fcc7b7545@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: C++ Broker and persistent store From: Mark Moseley To: users@qpid.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Sorry, I was a too vague. I've got the RHM store working with the svn > copy of Qpid just fine. The only thing I wasn't able to get working > was the RHM store with the 0.4 release. I didn't have any problem > getting it to compile against the qpid svn copy. I was just curious if > that's the correct way to do it or if there was something else much > easier that I was missing. If that is the correct way to do it, are > there any plans to add the store directly to the qpid source > distribution? If not, it might make a good FAQ addition. > Actually, after another go around, I see what I did wrong -- guess I shouldn't have been trying it initially at 1am :) The store configure --with-qpid-checkout option wants a directory that looks like the full distribution, but I had unpackaged just the cpp broker on its own. Getting it back to having the same directory structure as the full distribution makes the store configure happy. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org