Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> The same for me...I would be happy to help on this topic. Especially
> if it should be part of QMan :)
> Bryan, just for curiosity,  could you explain me better?
> I believe that a resource exposed for management must be stateful so I
> suppose you were talking about a stateful session bean isn'it ?
> A stateless or an entity bean is pooled so how it's possible to bind a
> specific instance on qmf?


I currently have a session bean (stateless) which exposes a command 
pattern front end. I would like to be able to expose this in the EJB 
container as a Message Driven Bean or annotate similar to how I would 
expose it as a Web Service. This may not address all the use cases of 
QMF, but I think it would hit a decent amount of them.

-- bk


> Anyway, if you want i'm really interested in this topic so maybe
> should be possible to do something together :)
> 
> Regards
> Andrea
> 
> On 2/16/09, Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>> Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>>> Yes, that is correct, QMan goes from QMF to JMX. The reverse mapping
>>>> needs to be completed. Rafi and I have looked at it some &
>>>> discussed.. want to help /contribute to it?
>>>> Carl.
>>>>
>>> I would be happy to help! Do you have discussions documented some
>>> place for me to read?
>> some content on wiki, lets see if it can be organized / updated and then
>> will post a pointer to it.
>>
>> Carl.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
>> Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org