Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-qpid-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 76709 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2008 15:46:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 2008 15:46:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 68712 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2008 15:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-qpid-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68698 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2008 15:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qpid-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: qpid-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list qpid-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68687 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2008 15:46:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:46:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mark.yoffe@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.174] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:06 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so566997wfd.21 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:45:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=XI7iSwpUsUCzVOqnxOeclXzj+a/7geL95MHpwHUGsHk=; b=MaQpR8vf2j0hmNT0l09k4NFek1gK0KLWPQGH5sguJf8mEKhhTw5x3OyDfrqPMgvahp 9vECzXftBaxHAXiEy68GSqlOg8nYtjlHkAAI69SABy1C5mIYn1S1aiAGJOCwlEI+Ulh0 V7cixGKR4weP9/2hVv/qKRim8YNC2IX4XgFfA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=YgXWKsXZGdzi9eW3suYRZ154qovCKmPCLFta2lBiw2+yqOw4Cy+i3nEN13iFBwHj5V tII2fDjk6uVlA4nLj29huqcMVA20UEwv7s6YR3/PUmhJGMk8UI9ahjKxb/OQ1+2m1JUP 1DJu0EMQKcKlw5Ek1xnVfBFhbl8jImvS55UT0= Received: by 10.143.28.8 with SMTP id f8mr1190767wfj.204.1227195950784; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:45:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.178.19 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:45:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4df0fedf0811200745mdba6049lcfaa3f150323f721@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:45:50 +0200 From: "mark yoffe" To: qpid-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: multiple listener ahsring a public queue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_125703_31843060.1227195950771" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_125703_31843060.1227195950771 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi i have been running scenario where several consumers connect to the same public queue (topic) the consumers connect via subscription manager. i have run several scenarios where multiple listeners use the same connection (different sessions) and scenario where listeners each have their own connection all of this has been run on TRUNC versions a while ago i started experiencing a serious down downgrade in performance when using such a scenario in the past the use of multiple listeners enabled me to enhance performance but currently it appears that i can achieve a faster performance while using 1 listener application in the past when several listeners used a shared queue - the message flow to between the consumers was not even (if using x listener one would expect to receive 1/x messages per listener) this problem/feature was corrected to support a pretty even distribution of the task as far as i can tell around the time this enhancement was made(it might not be connected but..) the performance started going down, and it is not a small difference using one listener i can achieve a speed of X for 100k messages per second using five listeners i experience a serious down grade of performance to ~5X for 100k messages per second this was not the case in the past and i am at a loss regarding this problem does anyone know , how this can be resolved Best Regards Mark ------=_Part_125703_31843060.1227195950771--