qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marnie McCormack" <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Needs for qpid C++ projects for Windows Visual Studio 2005?
Date Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:34:47 GMT

Just to say, in case anyone missed it, that MSDN subs are free to Apache
committers and include the express editions of MS tools.


On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com>wrote:

> 2008/11/19 Robert Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>:
> > I meant to post on this topic previously.  I think it would be
> > tremendously helpful if the M4 release included Windows binaries -
> > especially since people in the windows end-user community are
> > generally (I think) more used to working with pre-built binaries than
> > performing builds themselves.
> Yes, it was Windows I was particularly keen to ensure we included.
> > I am less convinced on the need to
> > provide linux binaries, although if people are willing to produce them
> > that would be fantastic.
> I suppose it depends how easy it is to build. If people have to mess
> about downloading stuff that isn't generally part of a standard distro
> then it would be better I think to provide a binary. I haven't built
> it for a while on linux so I'll leave it to others to judge whether
> that is a concern now (I know it certainly used to be!). NB standard
> distro here means widely used versions, not fedora core 350 pre-alpha.
> RG

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message