Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-qpid-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 9324 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 17:30:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2007 17:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 43080 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2007 17:30:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-qpid-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43064 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2007 17:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qpid-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: qpid-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list qpid-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43055 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2007 17:30:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:30:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aconway@redhat.com designates 66.187.233.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.187.233.31] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:30:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAJHTsgl022321; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:29:54 -0500 Received: from pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (pobox-2.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAJHTrQw022170; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:29:53 -0500 Received: from [10.13.248.54] (vpn-248-54.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.54]) by pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAJHTqJ9030814; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:29:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4741C810.4000605@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:29:52 -0500 From: Alan Conway Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qpid-users@incubator.apache.org, Dan Mihai Dumitriu Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: QPID clustering] References: <4740F630.1030408@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4740F630.1030408@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: QPID clustering > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:50:22 -0500 > From: Dan Mihai Dumitriu > Reply-To: qpid-users@incubator.apache.org > To: qpid-users@incubator.apache.org > References: <000901c82a03$3c936420$b5ba2c60$@com> > <129a14790711181147y7c07abaen94c44e5635fa81fc@mail.gmail.com> > > > > I'm actually rather interested in the HA features as well. Could you > expound a bit on how to set up HA using Veritas? Is it essentially > pushing the HA storage problem down to the storage layer (HA DB or NAS)? > I've started some HA work on the C++ broker trunk, its currently in suspended animation while I focus attention on performance of the core functionality. So far the cluster supports replicated "wiring" (queue & exchange declarations) via OpenAIS, a reliable multicast protocol. Next step is to replicate queue state. This could be done via multicast also but there's an argument that replicating point-to-point to a limited number of backups will be make less inclined to saturate the network. I expect I will experiment with both to see how it works out. A full N-way, all-multicast solution has the advantage of being more robust and a lot simpler to configure, but the performance benefits may make a limited-backup point-to-point option viable as well. Thre's some more detail at http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/cluster-design-note.html - its slightly out of date as it still talks in terms of the 0-8 protocol, but the concepts are pretty much the same. I expect to get back to this full time within the next month or so, very happy to hear any suggestions you might have. Cheers, Alan.