qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Greig" <robert.j.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: QPID M2 and Berkley DB
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:41:19 GMT
On 04/11/2007, Andy Grove <andy@codesuccess.com> wrote:

> Sure. That makes sense. In fact, I'm working on a product/solution where
> I'll be using messaging and databases in a transactional way and it's
> imperative that the performance of messaging (with persistent messages,
> durable subscribers and transactions) is faster than the database
> operations. I'm in the process of performance testing a prototype of the
> solution and I'll be using QPID M2 and Berkeley DB for now and will see how
> the performance looks.

It will be interesting if you could share your findings with us. In
our performance testing (admittedly with a SAN) we have seen around
700 msgs/second (single commit per message).on a simple point to point
test case.

> I don't have experience of HOWL but have worked with low-level transaction
> code in the past (implementing an EJB container). I guess there's no reason
> why I couldn't just have a go at creating an implementation of the
> MessageStore interface - that would at least be a fast way to familiarise
> myself with the work involved and see if it makes sense for me to contribute
> towards this.

Yes definitely. The BDB store is probably a good example to follow.


View raw message