qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Matos <bruno.ma...@paradigmaxis.pt>
Subject RE: Performance: C++ client - Windows VS LInux
Date Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:36:21 GMT
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 11:49 +0100, Bruno Matos wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:50 -0400, Steve Huston wrote:
> > Hi Bruno,
> > 
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> > 
> > You're welcome.
> > 
> > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 07:06 -0400, Steve Huston wrote:
> > > > Hi Bruno,
> > > > 
> > > > > I'm facing some performance issues with a Windows client. I
> > > > > made some tests and the difference is between 625857 
> > > > > microseconds/packet in Windows and 30110 microseconds/packet 
> > > > > in Linux. This is the average of 10.000.000 packets.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The windows libs were compiled from svn tag 0.6, and the
> > > > > Linux libs are from Fodera 13's Yum repos.
> > > > 
> > > > What version of Qpid did you test with on Fedora?
> > > 
> > > I'm using 0.6.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Some ideas? There are any precopiled distribution supported
> > > > > by the project?
> > > > 
> > > > You can get a Qpid 0.6 installable from 
> > > > http://www.riverace.com/qpid/downloads.htm, but it's 0.6 - probably 
> > > > not significantly different from what you tested.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > With this libs I get 573361 microseconds/packet. A little 
> > > less, but not enough.
> > 
> > Right...
> > 
> > > > If you get profiling info that may help to improve this, 
> > > please let me 
> > > > know. I'm also available to help get that information.

I have two output files from Sleepy, with asynchronous and synchronous
session. Sleepy can be found in www.codersnotes.com/sleepy.

> > > 
> > > I think I will do a simple test program only for this. What 
> > > do I need to get useful profiling information?
> > 
> > Output from any reasonable performance measurement. Something like
> > Rational Quantify would do it, or one of Intel's thread measuring tools
> > (I forget the name).
> > 
> 
> I have a simple program now that sends and receives messages. It starts
> counting time right before sending (synchronous), and stop counting when
> message arrives. I get 757 microseconds/packet in Linux and 39118
> microseconds/packet in Windows as an average of 10.000 packets. I will
> try Very Sleepy free profiling tool.

Thank you,
Bruno Matos

Mime
View raw message