qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kerry Bonin <kerrybo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Access to qpidd original arg list from {platform specific}QpiddBroker.cpp ?
Date Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:46:33 GMT
There is a UAC issue on installing a service, in that if you try and use the
--install command while logged in as a user that does not have the privilege
to install services, it will (properly) fail.  So that is working as it
should - in our testing here we use that command during our installation
process, which is running with elevated privileges, so it works at that
time, as it should.

As for normal use, I have the broker by default install itself under the
LocalSystem account, which IIRC is the recommended account for services, and
this account has reduced privileges on later Windows.  If you NEED to run it
with more or less privileges, you can create or use an existing account
appropriately, and just tell the broker to use that account - you only need
to provide the credentials once, and Windows SCM manages the token
generation and caching as per normal SCM rules, and when you try installing
it you would obviously need sufficient rights to use that account AND
install a service.

I'm pretty sure this all meets guidelines, as I'm never violating any
security rules that I know of...  (and I'm a hardcore security / crypto
geek, 25+ years...)

If you would like me to disable the self-installation features before patch,
I certainly can...


On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Andrew Stitcher <astitcher@redhat.com>wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:21 -0500, Kerry Bonin wrote:
> > Hello, and thanks for the comments!
> >
> > First, thank you Andrew for GetCommandLine() - 20 something years on
> > Windows, and I don't remember seeing that one before, certainly made this
> > simpler.
> >
> > On the subject of the command line in general for a service - I agree
> that
> > under most normal use a config file should be used, I just wanted to make
> > sure the command line was usable...
> >
> > On the security of self-installing services - if the service is doing
> much
> > more than installing itself, especially if it contains baked in
> credentials,
> > ect., that would be a very bad thing.  What I've done is essentially the
> > equivalent of sc create|start|stop|delete wrap as a convenience function,
> > nothing more, and the calls execute with the same privilege level a user
> has
> > available to them at the command line.
> ISTR that the issue is related to UAC, but I admit I can't quite see
> what the issue could be.
> One security related issue I'd suggest is that if running qpid as a
> service then we should run as an unprivileged user though with network
> access. qpidd only shuffles bits around a network so doesn't seem to
> need elevated privileges.
> I'm not sure how this fits exactly, but I assume that you'd need to
> create a new user account on installation and run the service using it.
> This would obviously require admin privileges.
> Andrew
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message