Mailing-List: contact qpid-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of asimon@redhat.com designates
 66.187.233.31 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: [java] test cases
From: Arnaud Simon <asimon@redhat.com>
Reply-To: asimon@redhat.com
To: Robert Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>
Cc: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <fde171c00705030352q38bb7509h39ad74900559e7c6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <12790468.1178124735491.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
	 <1178188803.9312.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <fde171c00705030352q38bb7509h39ad74900559e7c6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Red Hat
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 13:08:47 +0200
Message-Id: <1178190527.9312.38.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Rob,

I was thinking about that actually. I think I'll do it as this is a very
useful feature to have. So, I have added this task on my TODO list. 

Cheers

Arnaud


On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:52 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote:
> Hi Arnuad,
> 
> what other stores are you writing?
> 
> We *really* could do with a persistent store that has Apache
> compatible licensing...  even if it's not the most efficient it would
> at least enable us to add persistence testing to our unit tests.
> 
> I started on looking at writing an JDBC/SQL based store for this
> purpose but would need to change it now you've made your changes.  If
> you're already looking at this, then I won't bother.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rob
> 
> On 03/05/07, Arnaud Simon <asimon@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There was one path mistake in the config file that I checked in but
> > Gordon has spotted it and solved it (Thanks for that Gordon).
> >
> > Apart from that I am still working on having all the test cases passing
> > against all the stores. So, I would encourage you not to use the current
> > revision for production. I'll let you know when everything has been
> > tested. I am also adding crash recovery tests that are useful for
> > testing tx.
> >
> > I have also updated the in-memory store and tx manager that were not
> > properly implemented but required (I'll produce a new patch soon). Note
> > that the BDB implementation is checked in under etp.108.redhat.com. I
> > have also other stores that are not yet finalized.
> >
> > One main thing that we need to change though is the way message chunks
> > are handled. At the minute this not really optimum.
> >
> > So, to summarize my plan for action for this week and next week is:
> > 1) finalize in memory store and tx
> > 2) have all the tests rewritten for the new store and tx interfaces
> > 3) have all the tests (Junit and system) passing against all the stores
> > 4) add crash recovery tests
> > 5) extend dtx support
> > 6) finalize new stores
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >