qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marnie McCormack" <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [java] test cases
Date Sat, 12 May 2007 13:42:28 GMT
Hi All,

Just to mention that there are already one/two JIRAs created for
writing/plugging in a persistent store and perhaps also for the JDBC/SQL
route.

Probably have low-ish numbers !

Great to see this stuff moving forward - thanks Arnauld !

Bfn,
Marnie
On 5/10/07, John O'Hara <john.r.ohara@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You make it sound so easy </awe>
>
> john
>
> On 03/05/07, Arnaud Simon <asimon@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I was thinking about that actually. I think I'll do it as this is a very
> > useful feature to have. So, I have added this task on my TODO list.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:52 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote:
> > > Hi Arnuad,
> > >
> > > what other stores are you writing?
> > >
> > > We *really* could do with a persistent store that has Apache
> > > compatible licensing...  even if it's not the most efficient it would
> > > at least enable us to add persistence testing to our unit tests.
> > >
> > > I started on looking at writing an JDBC/SQL based store for this
> > > purpose but would need to change it now you've made your changes.  If
> > > you're already looking at this, then I won't bother.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > On 03/05/07, Arnaud Simon <asimon@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > There was one path mistake in the config file that I checked in but
> > > > Gordon has spotted it and solved it (Thanks for that Gordon).
> > > >
> > > > Apart from that I am still working on having all the test cases
> > passing
> > > > against all the stores. So, I would encourage you not to use the
> > current
> > > > revision for production. I'll let you know when everything has been
> > > > tested. I am also adding crash recovery tests that are useful for
> > > > testing tx.
> > > >
> > > > I have also updated the in-memory store and tx manager that were not
> > > > properly implemented but required (I'll produce a new patch soon).
> > Note
> > > > that the BDB implementation is checked in under etp.108.redhat.com.
> I
> > > > have also other stores that are not yet finalized.
> > > >
> > > > One main thing that we need to change though is the way message
> chunks
> > > > are handled. At the minute this not really optimum.
> > > >
> > > > So, to summarize my plan for action for this week and next week is:
> > > > 1) finalize in memory store and tx
> > > > 2) have all the tests rewritten for the new store and tx interfaces
> > > > 3) have all the tests (Junit and system) passing against all the
> > stores
> > > > 4) add crash recovery tests
> > > > 5) extend dtx support
> > > > 6) finalize new stores
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message