pulsar-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] [pulsar] ambition119 opened a new pull request #3791: [pulsar-functions] fix words error and remove not use import java class
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:02:28 GMT
ambition119 opened a new pull request #3791: [pulsar-functions] fix words error and remove
not use import java class
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/3791
   ### Contribution Checklist
     - Name the pull request in the form "[Issue XYZ][component] Title of the pull request",
where *XYZ* should be replaced by the actual issue number.
       Skip *Issue XYZ* if there is no associated github issue for this pull request.
       Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component. E.g. `[docs]
Fix typo in produce method`.
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the pull request.
That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from multiple issues.
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and this checklist,
leaving only the filled out template below.
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
   ### Motivation
      when I study and read this module code , I fix some error like:
   1. words error, such as JaveInstance -> JavaInstance, Recieved -> Received,  Unknwon
-> Unknown, alterted -> alterted, Updare -> Update, etc.
   2. remove not use import java class.
   3. duplicated code in this  java class I extract method. 
   4. javadoc  styles are consistent (not required)
   ### Modifications
   minor fix up in pulsar-functions module
   ### Verifying this change
   - [ ✔️] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure*
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   *If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes*
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / **no**)
     - The public API: (yes / **no**)
     - The schema: (yes / **no** / don't know)
     - The default values of configurations: (yes / **no**)
     - The wire protocol: (yes / **no**)
     - The rest endpoints: (yes / **no**)
     - The admin cli options: (yes / **no**)
     - Anything that affects deployment: (yes / **no** / don't know)
   ### Documentation
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / **no**)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / **not documented**)
     - If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
     - If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding
the documentation

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:

With regards,
Apache Git Services

View raw message