From commits-return-21387-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@pulsar.apache.org Tue Jan 29 02:38:59 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EB8218067A for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 02:38:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 18277 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2019 01:38:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@pulsar.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@pulsar.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@pulsar.apache.org Received: (qmail 18267 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2019 01:38:58 -0000 Received: from ec2-52-202-80-70.compute-1.amazonaws.com (HELO gitbox.apache.org) (52.202.80.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 01:38:58 +0000 From: GitBox To: commits@pulsar.apache.org Subject: [GitHub] srkukarni opened a new pull request #3468: Add a component tag for every pulsar function Message-ID: <154872593749.27699.1722430768354606129.gitbox@gitbox.apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 01:38:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit srkukarni opened a new pull request #3468: Add a component tag for every pulsar function URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/3468 ### Motivation While Launching functions in Kubernetes, it would be great to tag pods which are functions. This pr adds the label "component" to "function" for every kubernetes function definition. ### Modifications *Describe the modifications you've done.* ### Verifying this change - [ ] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks. *(Please pick either of the following options)* This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. *(or)* This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*. *(or)* This change added tests and can be verified as follows: *(example:)* - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)* - *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure* ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts: *If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes* - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no) - The public API: (yes / no) - The schema: (yes / no / don't know) - The default values of configurations: (yes / no) - The wire protocol: (yes / no) - The rest endpoints: (yes / no) - The admin cli options: (yes / no) - Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know) ### Documentation - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no) - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented) - If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why? - If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: users@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services