pulsar-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mme...@apache.org
Subject [incubator-pulsar.wiki] branch master updated: Created Apache Maturity Model Assessment for Pulsar (markdown)
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2018 01:11:07 GMT
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

mmerli pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-pulsar.wiki.git

The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new b4cacd5  Created Apache Maturity Model Assessment for Pulsar (markdown)
b4cacd5 is described below

commit b4cacd5edd84de42d9b6c89bf6155f27d258b56f
Author: Matteo Merli <mmerli@apache.org>
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 27 18:11:05 2018 -0700

    Created Apache Maturity Model Assessment for Pulsar (markdown)
 Apache-Maturity-Model-Assessment-for-Pulsar.md | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Apache-Maturity-Model-Assessment-for-Pulsar.md b/Apache-Maturity-Model-Assessment-for-Pulsar.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2074b03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Apache-Maturity-Model-Assessment-for-Pulsar.md
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+| ID | Description | Status |
+| ***Code*** | | |
+| CD10     | The project produces Open Source software, for distribution to the public at
no charge. | **YES** The project source code is licensed under the Apache License, version
2.0.                      |
+| CD20     | The project's code is easily discoverable and publicly accessible. | **YES**
Linked from the website, available via GitBox  https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-pulsar.git
and https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar. |
+| CD30     | The code can be built in a reproducible way using widely available standard
tools. | **YES** The build uses Apache Maven for Java code and CMake for C++ code. Continuous
integration is used |
+| CD40     | The full history of the project's code is available via a source code control
system, in a way that allows any released version to be recreated. | **YES**  All the history
of the project is available through Git. All releases are properly tagged. |
+| CD50     | The provenance of each line of code is established via the source code control
system, in a reliable way based on strong authentication of the committer. When third-party
contributions are committed, commit messages provide reliable information about the code provenance.
 | **YES** The git repository is managed by Apache Infra. Only Pulsar committers have write
access. All code is checked in after at least 2 committers have approved a pull-request. For
3rd party contribution [...]
+| ***Licenses and Copyright*** | | |
+| LC10     | The code is released under the Apache License, version 2.0. | **YES** Source
distributions clearly state license. Convenience binaries clearly state license. |
+| LC20     | Libraries that are mandatory dependencies of the project's code do not create
more restrictions than the Apache License does. | **YES** The list of mandatory dependencies
have been reviewed to contain approved licenses only.|
+| LC30     | The libraries mentioned in LC20 are available as Open Source software. | **YES**
All dependencies are available as open source software. |
+| LC40     | Committers are bound by an Individual Contributor Agreement (the "Apache iCLA")
that defines which code they are allowed to commit and how they need to identify code that
is not their own. | **YES** The project uses a repository managed by Apache Infra &mdash;
write access requires an Apache account, which requires an ICLA on file. |
+| LC50     | The copyright ownership of everything that the project produces is clearly defined
and documented. | **YES** Software Grant Agreement for the initial donation from Yahoo was
filed. All files in the source repository have appropriate headers. Automated process is in
place to ensure every file has expected headers. |
+| ***Releases*** | | |
+| RE10     | Releases consist of source code, distributed using standard and open archive
formats that are expected to stay readable in the long term. | **YES** Source releases are
distributed via https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pulsar/ and linked from
the website at https://pulsar.incubator.apache.org/download/.
+| RE20     | Releases are approved by the project's PMC (see CS10), in order to make them
an act of the Foundation.| **YES** All incubating releases have been approved by the Pulsar
community with at least 3 PPMC votes and from the Incubator with 3 IPMC votes. |
+| RE30     | Releases are signed and/or distributed along with digests that can be reliably
used to validate the downloaded archives. | **YES** All releases are signed, and the KEYS
file is provided on dist.apache.org. |
+| RE40     | Convenience binaries can be distributed alongside source code but they are not
Apache Releases -- they are just a convenience provided with no guarantee. | **YES** Convenience
binaries are distributed via via dist.apache.org. Java binary artifacts are also distributed
through Maven Central Repository. |
+| RE50     | The release process is documented and repeatable to the extent that someone
new to the project is able to independently generate the complete set of artifacts required
for a release. | **YES** Step-by-step release guide is available describing the entire process.
The Pulsar releases have been performed by 5 different release managers. |
+| ***Quality*** | | |
+| QU10     | The project is open and honest about the quality of its code. Various levels
of quality and maturity for various modules are natural and acceptable as long as they are
clearly communicated. | **YES** The project records all bugs in the GitHub issue tracker at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/issues |
+| QU20     | The project puts a very high priority on producing secure software. | **YES**
Security issues are treated with the highest priority, according to the CVE/Security Advisory
procedure. |
+| QU30     | The project provides a well-documented channel to report security issues, along
with a documented way of responding to them. | **YES**  Website provides a link to ASF security
page https://www.apache.org/security/ from each page. |
+| QU40     | The project puts a high priority on backwards compatibility and aims to document
any incompatible changes and provide tools and documentation to help users transition to new
features. | **YES** Pulsar releases have to goal not to break backward and forward compatibility
across releases, even across major ones. Regarding APIs, methods are marked as deprecated
and warning is provided that at some point in future they might be removed. Each release contains
a summary of most im [...]
+| QU50     | The project strives to respond to documented bug reports in a timely manner.
| **YES** The project has resolved 378 bugs during incubation. |
+| ***Community*** | | |
+| CO10     | The project has a well-known homepage that points to all the information required
to operate according to this maturity model. | **YES** The project website has a description
of the project with technical details, how to contribute, team. |
+| CO20     | The community welcomes contributions from anyone who acts in good faith and
in a respectful manner and adds value to the project. | **YES** It’s part of the contribution
guide (http://pulsar.incubator.apache.org/contributing) and the current committers are really
keen to welcome contributions.
+| CO30     | Contributions include not only source code, but also documentation, constructive
bug reports, constructive discussions, marketing and generally anything that adds value to
the project. | **YES** The contribution guide refers to non source code contribution, like
documentation. |
+| CO40     | The community is meritocratic and over time aims to give more rights and responsibilities
to contributors who add value to the project. | **YES** The community has elected 5 new committers
during incubation, based on meritocracy. |
+| CO50     | The way in which contributors can be granted more rights such as commit access
or decision power is clearly documented and is the same for all contributors. | **YES** The
criteria is documented in the contribution guide. |
+| CO60     | The community operates based on consensus of its members (see CS10) who have
decision power. Dictators, benevolent or not, are not welcome in Apache projects. | **YES**
The project works to build consensus. All votes from the community have been unanimous so
far. All technical discussions and disagreements have been resolved in a positive ways, addressing
the concerns from all the people involved.
+| CO70     | The project strives to answer user questions in a timely manner. | **YES** The
project typically provides detailed answers to user questions within a few hours via dev@
and user@ mailing lists.
+| ***Consensus Building*** | | |
+| CS10     | The project maintains a public list of its contributors who have decision power
-- the project's PMC (Project Management Committee) consists of those contributors. | **YES**
The website contains the list of committers and PPMC members at http://pulsar.incubator.apache.org/team/.
+| CS20     | Decisions are made by consensus among PMC members and are documented on the
project's main communications channel. Community opinions are taken into account but the PMC
has the final word if needed. | **YES** The project has been making all decisions on the project
mailing lists. |
+| CS30     | Documented voting rules are used to build consensus when discussion is not sufficient.
| **YES** The project uses the standard ASF voting rules. Voting rules are clearly stated
before the voting starts for each individual vote. |
+| CS40     | In Apache projects, vetoes are only valid for code commits and are justified
by a technical explanation, as per the Apache voting rules defined in CS30. | **YES** The
project hasn’t used a veto at any point and relies on mandatory code reviews. |
+| CS50     | All "important" discussions happen asynchronously in written form on the project's
main communications channel. Offline, face-to-face or private discussions that affect the
project are also documented on that channel. | **YES** The project has been making all decisions
on the project mailing lists. Technical discussions may happen during code reviews, or when
commenting on issues. These conversations are also in written form and asynchronous, and are
copied back to the proje [...]

View raw message