portals-pluto-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dettborn <dettb...@web.de>
Subject Re: Adding JSR-286 API jar to a Maven repository
Date Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:01:56 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Ate Douma schrieb:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>> The biggest question is probably concerning licensing and if we're
>>> allowed to publish it.  This may not be an issue, but it's
>>> something we need to look into before we move forward.
Yes this will be a problem, under this point of view this will be a
big problem. So there won't be so many api changes, so we can let it
as it is.
>> Yepp,
>>
>> I'm not sure why we have to deploy this into a public available
>> repository? Shouldn't the api be just a module which is build
>> during the
>> whole build as well?
> I agree, this shouldn't be made available in a public repository yet
> and I also don't see any technical reason why it should.
> You really would need to get clearance from IBM for that.
>
>>
>> For the version I guess '2.0-ED2-Rev13' is fine.
> Yes, not SNAPSHOT for sure.
>
>>
>> Carsten
>>> CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As part of the development of the JSR-286 Reference
>>>> Implementation, a copy of the portlet API jar (found here:
>>>> http://ipc658.inf-swt.uni-jena.de/spec/JSR%202.0%20API/lib/)
>>>> needs to be deployed to a Maven 2 repository. I was wondering
>>>> which repository should I use for this purpose? Should it be the
>>>> pluto-staging or apache.snapshot repository noted in the root
>>>> pom.xml file or somewhere else?
>>>>
>>>> I also need to know what is the appropriate naming convention to
>>>> use for this file (i.e. the version element in the pom.xml). The
>>>> current portlet-2.0.jar is based on the Early Draft 2, Revision
>>>> 13 of the JSR-286 spec, so it seems like the version element
>>>> value should be something like '2.0-ED2-Rev13'. I'm not sure if
>>>> we need to append 'SNAPSHOT' to this version value. Please advise?
>>>>
>>>> I am assuming that the groupId would be javax.portlet and the
>>>> artifactId would be portlet-api for this file as is now the case
>>>> for the portlet-1.0.jar file that contains the JSR-168 API.
>>>> /Craig
>>
>>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFGIJiDwaBuBD/AhYARAixbAKDMFEoifGfSKBXH5JR0XdGU98XRQwCfVdAs
S96sUMHl1KjD/cAVXj8vwo4=
=/QNZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mime
View raw message