Mailing-List: contact jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jetspeed Users List" <jetspeed-user@portals.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: dev or user group question?
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:45:48 -0500
Message-ID: <3D68A9B9A8E58049A19EBD6D561A33050B1CEF@R2D2.CCGI.INTRA>
Thread-Topic: dev or user group question?
Thread-Index: AcYhF87QqQan5qzCRKS5Ww1CHAh4egABfnkA
From: "Garner Andrews" <Garner@CCGI.NET>
To: "Jetspeed Users List" <jetspeed-user@portals.apache.org>,
	<jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>

We have our own security app that we've revealed with a web service.  We
want to replace the Jetspeed2 authentication and authorization functions
with our app.  Has anyone experimented with this at all yet?  Can you
even swap out the internal portal maintenance users' security roles or
do you have to use what's already there?  I'm really trying to gauge the
level of effort this will take.  I've read everything I have found so
far in the mail archives and in the other support areas and not found
answers to these questions yet.  If I missed something, please don't
hesitate to point me in the right direction.

Thanks,
Garner

C. Garner Andrews
Enterprise Architect
CompuNet Consulting Group, Inc.
+mailto:garner@ccgi.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org