portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron Evans" <aaronmev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Jetspeed and dojo
Date Tue, 23 May 2006 17:00:32 GMT
Hi Steve,
thanks for the info. That is very helpful.

I suppose if jetspeed is used in its "default" form (ie. not jetspeed
desktop), then dojo.js is not used at all, correct? (Excuse my
ignorance, I haven't really checked out jetspeed desktop yet).



On 5/22/06, Steve Milek <s.milek@comcast.net> wrote:
> At this time, jetspeed-desktop is using a nightly source build of dojo from
> 2006-04-21. We plan to replace the 04-21 edition with the official dojo 0.3
> release (from 2006-05-15). Jetspeed-desktop should not be adversely affected
> by use of a later dojo version (later meaning anything after what is
> currently checked-in: dojo nightly build 2006-04-21).
>
> We use dojo source builds because we're still developing jetspeed-desktop.
> Replacing the source build with one of the compressed editions should not
> cause problems (so long as the particular compressed edition does not
> exclude dojo components needed by jetspeed-desktop - and of course it must
> be 2006-04-21 or later).
>
> When deploying jetspeed, dojo is expanded from this zip file:
>    src/javascript/dojo/dojo.zip
> to:
>    <portal-webapp-context>/javascript/dojo/
>
> Also, it is not possible for two versions of dojo to exist in the same
> webpage. In fact, it is disastrous.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Evans [mailto:aaronmevans@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 7:55 AM
> To: jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org
> Subject: Jetspeed and dojo
>
>
> Hey guys,
> I know that dojo has been baked into jetspeed post release 2.0 to
> support the desktop features and that is great.
>
> I have been working against 2.0 for a while now and am looking forward
> to upgrading to 2.1.  However, in the mean time, I've been using
> elements of dojo within my portlets.
>
> So I'm wondering what the impact will be when I upgrade.  Assuming we
> are using different versions and builds, is it even possible to have
> an aggregated portal page that combines two different "dojo runtimes"
> (for lack of a better term)?
>
> Can you give me some details as to what version is being used?  Are
> you doing a dojo "build" (ie. creating a slimmed down build of just
> the required elements)?  And if so, has that been put into the
> jetspeed build process so that one can incorporate their own dojo
> packages?
>
> thx in advance,
> aaron
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org


Mime
View raw message