Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-portals-jetspeed-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81047 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 22:55:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 22:55:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 26210 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2006 22:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-portals-jetspeed-dev-archive@portals.apache.org Received: (qmail 26169 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2006 22:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Jetspeed Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org Received: (qmail 26157 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2006 22:55:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:55:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [69.25.214.2] (HELO secure.wispertel.net) (69.25.214.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:55:28 -0800 Received: (qmail 20021 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 22:55:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwatlerxps.finali.net) (66.179.180.250) by secure.wispertel.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 22:55:06 -0000 Subject: Re: jetspeed 2.0 FINAL From: Randy Watler To: Jetspeed Developers List In-Reply-To: <43C82541.4090202@gmail.com> References: <43C7DC04.2090402@gmail.com> <1137189277.3163.5.camel@rwatlerxps.finali.net> <43C82541.4090202@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:55:04 -0700 Message-Id: <1137192905.3576.7.camel@rwatlerxps.finali.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jacek, I am not sure what the problem is. In general, the security stuff has and does for many. It seems that you are trying the right things. That said, I assume there must be a bug somewhere. Let me see if I can recreate the problem here somehow. Sorry, I dont have a better answer at the moment. Randy On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 23:10 +0100, Jacek Wiślicki wrote: > Wiadomosc od Randy Watler z 2006-01-13 22:54 brzmiala: > > > Jacek, > > > > That security constraint is malformed. > > > > If you want to restrict view to managers only, please try something like > > this: > > > > > > > > manager > > view > > > > > Well, the previous code references the definition in page.security in > the root folder (as far as I remember the one included in Jetspeed demo > pages). Unfortunately, your code didn't help. Is it a bug or some > misconfiguration at my side? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org