Return-Path: 
 <jetspeed-dev-return-24702-apmail-portals-jetspeed-dev-archive=portals.apache.org@portals.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-portals-jetspeed-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28215 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2005 15:50:54 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2005 15:50:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 83930 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2005 15:50:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-portals-jetspeed-dev-archive@portals.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83842 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2005 15:50:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>
List-Id: <jetspeed-dev.portals.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Jetspeed Developers List" <jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83809 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2005 15:50:44 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:50:44 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [216.23.125.30] (HELO mx.scriptall.com) (216.23.125.30)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:52:13 -0800
Received: (qmail 23397 invoked by uid 512); 29 Nov 2005 10:50:26 -0500
Received: from david@bluesunrise.com by edison by uid 509 with
 qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms
 (clamdscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 2.63.  Clear:RC:1(64.105.95.102):.
 Processed in 0.030951 secs); 29 Nov 2005 15:50:26 -0000
X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: david@bluesunrise.com via edison
X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(64.105.95.102):. Processed in
 0.030951 secs Process 23393)
Received: from h-64-105-95-102.snvacaid.covad.net (HELO [192.168.1.113])
 (david@bluesunrise.com@64.105.95.102)
	by mx.scriptall.com with SMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:50:25 -0500
Message-ID: <438C78B9.9080402@bluesunrise.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:50:17 -0800
From: David Sean Taylor <david@bluesunrise.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jetspeed Developers List <jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Ajax
References: <3b728ee90511240229w46f97a42g806ac5f541bae1d2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4385E4E3.7050903@bluesunrise.com>
	 <3b728ee90511241127y35103751l951fe4182d2068b3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4386190C.1020109@bluesunrise.com>
	 <3b728ee90511280128i5e3b4366tf6e2cbda2ebd90a5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <438B360C.2070104@bluesunrise.com>
 <3b728ee90511281208t5f167790hb4e657413189d62b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3b728ee90511281208t5f167790hb4e657413189d62b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Christophe Lombart wrote:
> On 11/28/05, David Sean Taylor <david@bluesunrise.com> wrote:
> 
>>Here we configure the security constraint or RBAC
>>I think I may simply go with RBAC for now
>>Let me know what you think, I should be able to get this into the Ajax
>>Pipeline today
>>
> 
> 
> RBAC is also ok for me. In your example,  what kind of component is
> AjaxGetRoles ? is it a simple portal service ?
> 
No, although arguably it could be.
Instead we have Ajax Actions and Builders:

public class AddGetRoles
     implements AjaxAction, AjaxBuilder

working very much like a portlet, in that its two-phase.
First phase is the action, second phase is the builder, building the 
Ajax XML response.

> 
> I like the solution #1 but I expect to write more javascript no ?
> Solution #2 avoid to write a lot of java script. A simple ajax respond
> with Rico can be (to update a group listbox) :
> 
> <ajax-response>
> 	<response type="element" id="group">	 		  					
> 		    <option value="g1">
> 					Group1
> 		    </option>
> 		    <option value="g2">
> 					Group2
> 		    </option>			
> 	</response>
> 	
> </ajax-response>
> 
> But I'm ok the solution #1 is better in point of view design. Do you
> make a choice for an ajax framework ?
>
I think you can use either way with this Ajax framework.
As long as there is some way to know the content type of the response


-- 
David Sean Taylor
Bluesunrise Software
david@bluesunrise.com
[office] +01 707 773-4646
[mobile] +01 707 529 9194

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org