Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jetspeed-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77095 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2005 23:06:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 23:06:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 35201 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2005 23:06:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jetspeed-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 34775 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2005 23:06:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jetspeed Developers List" Reply-To: "Jetspeed Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 34762 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2005 23:06:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=PLING_QUERY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (HELO postfix3-1.free.fr) (213.228.0.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:06:47 -0800 Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cube.luta.org [81.57.121.143]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC4C1734A8 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:06:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4224F586.1080402@aptiwan.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:06:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Luta?= Organization: Aptiwan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jetspeed Developers List Subject: Re: Jetspeed-2: Drop support for Tomcat 4...? Please comment/vote! References: <4223DE7B.10302@douma.nu> <4223E407.2040600@douma.nu> <42240AEA.8020407@wispertel.net> <4224E4E7.7090705@bluesunrise.com> <4224EE0E.7090204@douma.nu> In-Reply-To: <4224EE0E.7090204@douma.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ate Douma wrote: > > > David Sean Taylor wrote: > >> Randy Watler wrote: >> >>> Ate/All, >>> >>> Yes, 4.1 is certainly painful when it comes to deployment. I can >>> verify most of what Ate has outlined here. >>> >>> +1 to drop 4.1. >> >> >> >> +1 to drop 4.1 support > > +1 > >> +1 to fix 5.5 support before dropping 4.1 > > +1 too > ... which I can say easily now as have 5.5.8 support ready right now ;-) > way cool :) > My refactored codebase can be deployed on both Tomcat 5.0.28 and 5.5.8 > using JDK 1.4.2_04 (I don't have JDK 5 installed yet and probably won't > for a while) > with only one build.properties change: > org.apache.jetspeed.catalina.version.major = 5.5 > > I'm in the process of cleaning up the mess in my codebase and then I'll > create a new branch and check it in (still have to figure out how to do > that though). > I can help you out if you need it... -- Rapha�l Luta - raphael.luta@aptiwan.com Aptiwan, l'intelligence du r�seau - http://www.aptiwan.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org