Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jetspeed-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 57924 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2002 14:19:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 14:19:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16108 invoked by uid 97); 4 Oct 2002 14:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16070 invoked by uid 97); 4 Oct 2002 14:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jetspeed Developers List" Reply-To: "Jetspeed Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16054 invoked by uid 98); 4 Oct 2002 14:19:53 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Pernoud?= To: "'Jetspeed Developers List'" Subject: RE: Portlet GetContent() called twice after an action ... ? Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:19:15 +0200 Message-ID: <9E035BE80785AA4EAA456959ECB4A30D01761171@nt036.an.sopra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <9E035BE80785AA4EAA456959ECB4A30D02B7388C@nt036.an.sopra> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sorry, wrong alert, seems to be a Javascript problem in my webapp that was making 2 calls to Jetspeed. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Aur�lien Pernoud [mailto:apernoud@sopragroup.com] > Envoy� : vendredi 4 octobre 2002 14:45 > � : 'Jetspeed Developers List' > Objet : Portlet GetContent() called twice after an action ... ? > > > > Hi there, > > I tried migrating my portlets and actions from 1.3a2 to 1.4b1 > and I have > troubles. > First, I'm not sure to understand : Should our portlets extend > AbstractPortlet or AbstractPortletInstance ? > Then, what's the right way to define portlets in XREG ? I'm > using only one > kind of portlet in my app that get its content from another > servlet, with > its parameters. With 1.3a2 I used to make and abstract type > of portlets and > then add all the other portlets as 'type="ref"' with its own > parameters. > > With 1.4b1 I tried the same way, my .xreg got rewritten and > always adding > the classname to use but it works. I also tried using the > 'type="instance"' > but I still have this issue : > > When I get into my action (that extends Turbine Action), then > the portlets > are refreshed, which is ok, but they're refreshed twice ! (I > traced it to > understand what was happening) > > Did anyone notice it too ? Is the migration from 1.3a2 harder > than I thought > ? > > Aur�lien Pernoud > Sopra Group > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: