portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Sean Taylor" <da...@bluesunrise.com>
Subject RE: Question on Muliple portlet instance behavior
Date Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:05:49 GMT
> You still want to keep the PersistenceService interface as is correct?

Im not tied to it at all. The interface looks overly complicated with
the inner Page interface
Please write a new interface if you think its necessary. 

I would rewrite it as a Turbine service, like every other service in
Jetspeed (except this one)

> I will start looking at gutting/rewriting the service.

Great!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:Sweaver@rippe.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:49 AM
> To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Question on Muliple portlet instance behavior
> 
> 
> You still want to keep the PersistenceService interface as is correct?
> 
> One the first suggestion I have would be to replace all the 
> instance of Vector with ArrayList, to improve performance.  
> They did this with Torque and supposedly it garnered them a 
> nice increase in performance.  The only issue I see with this 
> would be if you are betting on those Lists to be threadsafe.
> 
> I will start looking at gutting/rewriting the service.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:david@bluesunrise.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:29 PM
> > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: Question on Muliple portlet instance behavior
> > 
> > I wouldn't mind if you rewrote the whole class and threw away the 
> > existing. That is what I was planning on doing. I think 
> > JetspeedPersistenceService is pretty bad
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:Sweaver@rippe.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:29 AM
> > > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> > > Subject: RE: Question on Muliple portlet instance behavior
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the response, David.  I am VERY interested in 
> getting it 
> > > work. I'm currently looking at the PersistenceService and 
> its inner 
> > > class, PersistenceService.Page, right now.  Let me now if 
> I'm on the
> > > right track and I will continue to work on it.  Hopefully, I
> > > will be able to come up with a suitable patch.
> > >
> > > I welcome any pointers you may have.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:david@bluesunrise.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:11 PM
> > > > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> > > > Subject: RE: Question on Muliple portlet instance behavior
> > > >
> > > > The JetspeedPersistenceService still needs to be updated to 
> > > > support portlet instances. It doesn't consider portlet ids 
> > > > (instances) or non-default pages. Its high on my todo 
> list, unless 
> > > > someone
> > > else fixes
> > > > it first...
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:Sweaver@rippe.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:57 AM
> > > > > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> > > > > Subject: Question on Muliple portlet instance behavior
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have noticed some "odd" behavior when it comes to multiple 
> > > > > instance of the same portlet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Example:
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's say I have a portlet, "MyPortlet", which extends 
> > > > > VelocityPortlet.  It has a single attribute called 
> "test." Now, 
> > > > > I add this portlet to 2 separate panes, pane_1 and 
> pane_2.  My 
> > > > > PSML file reflects that MyPortlet is in fact in both pane_1
> > > and pane_2,
> > > > > each instance of MyPortlet has a unique ID value. So far so 
> > > > > good.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, this is the part that does not seem right, to me at
> > > least.  If
> > > > > I have an action that sets the value of the attribute "test", 
> > > > > regardless of which instance of MyPortlet calls the
> > > action the value
> > > > > is both stored and retrieved from the first (as it appears in 
> > > > > the PSML file) instance of MyPortlet in pane_1.  The second
> > > instance of
> > > > > MyPortlet in pane_2 never gets or sets its own attribute
> > > "test", and
> > > > > it always refers to the attribute "test" in the first 
> instance 
> > > > > of MyPortlet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Before I dig any deeper I need to ask, "Is this correct
> > > behavior for
> > > > > multiple instances of the same portlet?"
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using the most current CVS HEAD for 1.3a3.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-dev-
> > > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-dev- 
> > > > help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-dev-
> > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-dev- 
> > help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message