portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ckl" <christi...@tenklooster.com>
Subject Re: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script
Date Thu, 02 May 2002 14:49:36 GMT
Hi David,

Yes I used the fulcrum classes, but now have modified them for my own needs.
I have build something like a virtualhost mechanisme where the same
db-schema is used in multiple databases in one webapp.
I did this by extending the JetspeedRunData and adding a "vhost" attribute.

It was hard but it works, however I want to use objectbridge for this now.
Maybe it is a good idea to drop torque when moving to turbine3.
I'm sure most ETC people want this after seeing the presentation of
objectbridge from Thomas Mahler.

Have you already implemented a new security system with objectbridge?
Or are you using this new service for storing the
"org.apache.jetspeed.om.registry.base."
If not I would be very interested, even if it still very beta (alpha?)

Anyway I would be happy to help in migrating to t3.

thanx,
Christiaan




----- Original Message -----
From: "David Sean Taylor" <david@bluesunrise.com>
To: "'Jetspeed Developers List'" <jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script


> Hi Christiaan,
>
> What about the JetspeedSecurity and TurbineSecurity classes
> (DBSecurityService, DBUserManager)?
> In your port, did you make use of the Fulcrum classes?
>
> David
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ckl [mailto:christiaan@tenklooster.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:56 AM
> > To: jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script
> >
> >
> > >Sounds good.  How well does Jetspeed work with Turbine-3 - any known
> > >problems/limitations?
> >
> > no real problems, just a lot of work, but also (on my w2k
> > machine) no real speed improvements but still, turbine 3 is
> > not optimized yet either ...
> >
> > >A frequent problem we get is sync'ing turbine-2 and torque - do you
> > >know if turbine-3 is any better with this - in particular, is
> > >TurbineUser a proper Torque generated object now?
> >
> > that was also for me one of the problems, it is better with
> > turbine3, you have to regenerate all om sources ofcource with
> > the decoupled torque. But I must say that I plan to use
> > objectbridge for the security classes
> >
> > >> There is a lot of jetspeed code that can benefit from the new
> > >> turbine3features.
> > > Such as?
> >
> > for example the templatelocaterservice could be rewritten as
> > Jason also suggested, this can be put in the pipeline.
> >
> >
> >
> > Christiaan ten Klooster
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message