Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jetspeed-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 41718 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2002 11:33:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2002 11:33:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 22451 invoked by uid 97); 3 Jan 2002 11:33:24 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 22435 invoked by uid 97); 3 Jan 2002 11:33:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jetspeed Developers List" Reply-To: "Jetspeed Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list jetspeed-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 22424 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2002 11:33:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3C343EBF.5020505@hisitech.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:21:35 +0100 From: Santiago Gala User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914 X-Accept-Language: es-es, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jetspeed Developers List Subject: Re: PortletAPI References: <000001c19440$3bb41540$a800a8c0@id3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Frans Thamura wrote: >Dear All, > >I want to ask a question about Jetspeed API from IBM. > >I think this draft is based on IBM WPS, right???? > Not exactly. IBM made this proposal before WPS was released. After discussion, IBM went on to implement it, while we stalled a little bit polishing problems with 1.3 implementation. > >There will be a lot of modification from current API right??? > Yes. Current API has problems with concurrency, and lacks isolation between portlets. Also, it was less scalable than needed for world class implementations. > >is this will become Portlet API 2.0???? > >I think that will be good idea, if we open a folder that contains a sample of every class... Is it relevant? > >Like this.. a sample for manipulating Portlet Config, a class for check the user status loggin or loggout. > >This will become a knowledge center of Portlet API.. > >What do you think guys??? > >Happy New Year. > >Frans > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: