polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (POLYGENE-273) Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
Date Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:17:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16457930#comment-16457930
] 

Niclas Hedhman commented on POLYGENE-273:
-----------------------------------------

Are you always this annoying??

I have explained above, and in separate email, THAT DOCUMENTATION IS PART OF IMMUTABLE RELEASE,
and Jira does NOT track what is "out there", but what is to be fixed for the next release.

And yes, the suggestion of changing the text has been committed, and is in a local branch
here pending push after I have worked out why some of Docker-based tests doesn't want to run
as they used to.

> Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POLYGENE-273
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273
>             Project: Polygene
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: [1] https://polygene.apache.org/java/latest/what-is-cop.html
>            Reporter: Sebb
>            Assignee: Niclas Hedhman
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.
> However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it now says:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> On the Zest site it used to say:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> Presumably it was originally
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same page has:
> bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims
> The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should not be editted.
> However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of the original
quote.
> Perhaps surround it with a box? Or use a different background or font?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message