polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Reopened] (POLYGENE-273) Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
Date Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:00:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Sebb reopened POLYGENE-273:
---------------------------

Please don't close the issue until the public website has been updated.

Also the other issue I mentioned has not been fixed

> Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POLYGENE-273
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273
>             Project: Polygene
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: [1] https://polygene.apache.org/java/latest/what-is-cop.html
>            Reporter: Sebb
>            Assignee: Niclas Hedhman
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.
> However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it now says:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> On the Zest site it used to say:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> Presumably it was originally
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same page has:
> bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims
> The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should not be editted.
> However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of the original
quote.
> Perhaps surround it with a box? Or use a different background or font?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message