polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (POLYGENE-273) Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
Date Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:14:01 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Sebb updated POLYGENE-273:
--------------------------
    Description: 
It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.

However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it now says:

{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor me :p)
called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}

On the Zest site it used to say:

{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor me :p)
called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}

Presumably it was originally

{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor me :p)
called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}

There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same page has:

bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims

The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should not be editted.
However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of the original
quote.
Perhaps surround it with a box? Or use a different background or font?

  was:
It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.

However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it now says:

{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor me :p)
called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}

On the Zest site it used to say:

{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor me :p)
called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}

Presumably it was originally

{code}
When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor me :p)
called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
{code}

There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same page has:

bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims

The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should nt be editted.
However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of the original
quote.


> Incorrect replacement by Zest/Polygene
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POLYGENE-273
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-273
>             Project: Polygene
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: [1] https://polygene.apache.org/java/latest/what-is-cop.html
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> It looks like all references to Qi4j were replaced by Zest and then by Polygene.
> However that makes a nonsense of historical references, for example in [1] it now says:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Apache Polygene™, written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> On the Zest site it used to say:
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Zest™ (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> Presumably it was originally
> {code}
> When I was doing my research for just that, I came cross a Java framework (just humor
me :p) called Qi4j (that’s chee for jay), written by Swedish Richard Öberg
> {code}
> There are other places where Polygene should still read Qi4j. e.g. the same page has:
> bq. As the Zest™ website proclaims
> The bulk of the page is a direct copy of the original. As such, it should not be editted.
> However it would be helpful if the page made it clear which parts are part of the original
quote.
> Perhaps surround it with a box? Or use a different background or font?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message