Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362C9200CCB for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:28:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 34A6F16B0BF; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BA3616B0BE for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:28:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 43805 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2017 10:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@polygene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@polygene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@polygene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43788 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2017 10:28:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:28:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4DE45C02AA for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:28:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kapsi.fi Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jy2pDcHil89a for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mail.kapsi.fi [217.30.184.167]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 80A235FE43 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:28:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kapsi.fi; s=20161220; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Reply-To:References:To:Subject; bh=KtDwO8ZzS/DQ4HVom1Aebk95huh1qXqM/6AIFXBKwck=; b=mDJlntmxQBgAXdQqlbRehO0cdokiRqu0fw0AWWB2+1ptwUNkKLCmfQN1RwJccabiFymrNSUUJwB2ACAn6PGvj6e5+QRCphIGkxfvXJ6TvkFF9KVHzZLPT5fK0IIx2GEFAQ+gfOP40gdA4h21Opv3IBwXo3GevucUgl0yXu0LGtElD8GQ+r7aC3PXPiQTXS0x5BlQi0VOABrU8UMmnuNGRZf9sh70e3u4ltPHzhZ1sLedAAafeAxlqplsG6eWG3oaalPxaTOXlP2Qj6tiSjhLNk/IFA0cog3kJMCKGtkpbnKXkqu8yrWYTY6aDjpDzHouXzH6MTCBqvDx2GS3gKPkgg==; Received: from 31-47-67-188.customers.tamico.com ([31.47.67.188] helo=[10.3.10.216]) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dY8hH-0001aB-SA for dev@polygene.apache.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:28:43 +0300 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Polygene (Java Edition) version 3.0.0 - Take 3 To: dev@polygene.apache.org References: <596CCE3A.2050506@apache.org> <5d1363c1c4a6d179d40d7f4a70abd702@nosphere.org> Reply-To: stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi From: Stanislav Muhametsin Message-ID: <9451785c-fb58-cb31-48eb-c9df2c63c99a@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:28:43 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d1363c1c4a6d179d40d7f4a70abd702@nosphere.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 31.47.67.188 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false archived-at: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:28:56 -0000 Since I don't have a Java environment set up, I go for: [x] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok On 20.7.2017 13:16, Paul Merlin wrote: > + Downloaded source distro > + Validated source distro signature (well, it's mine so that was easy) > + Built from source distro > + Consumed Maven convenience artifacts from staged repository > > +1 (binding) > > Cheers > > > Le 2017-07-17 16:48, Paul Merlin a écrit : >> Dear community, >> >> I am happy to start again the VOTE thread for Apache Polygene (Java >> Edition) 3.0.0! >> >> The changelog for this release can be found here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12332998&projectId=12316820 >> >> >> Tag: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=polygene-java.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/3.0.0-RC3 >> >> >> The distributions to be voted on are located here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polygene/ >> >> Convenience artifacts in a maven repository are staged here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/polygene/ >> >> >> Release distributions and convenience artifacts are signed with the >> following key: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polygene/KEYS >> >> Some guidance on how to validate distributions and artifacts can be >> found here: >> https://polygene.apache.org/java/develop/releasing-apache.html#_verifying_a_release_candidate >> >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Polygene (Java Edition) >> 3.0.0. >> >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> least three +1 PMC votes are cast and there must be more positive than >> negative votes. >> >> [ ] +1 Release Apache Polygene (Java Edition) 3.0.0 >> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok >> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Polygene (Java Edition) 3.0.0 because... >> >> Cheers > >