Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939F5200CD1 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 922E1168F4A; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D99BB168EB5 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 48895 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2017 17:09:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@polygene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@polygene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@polygene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48883 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2017 17:09:20 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:09:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A5E42C02BE for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.252 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.252 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKK7eK4fTMH7 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 051135FBE2 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail9-d.mgt.gandi.net [10.58.1.149]) (Authenticated sender: paul@nosphere.org) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 13C61C5A71 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:09:10 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:09:10 +0200 From: Paul Merlin To: dev@polygene.apache.org Subject: Re: Logo Contest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5a03be09e95f1fddf96e022c320c69a4@nosphere.org> X-Sender: paulmerlin@apache.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 archived-at: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:09:21 -0000 Hi all, tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83) Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line. But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out. Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83). I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched. Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :) Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me. My 2 cents Cheers Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > I hereby declare the poll concluded. > > Most votes; #40 > Most 5 star; #40 > Highest average; #63 > > I call that somewhat inconclusive. > > Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63 > (and > #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a lot > of > designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready to > take > on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been much > more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all. > > What does others think? > > Cheers > Niclas > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman > wrote: > >> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do so, >> because the result is somewhat inconclusive. >> >> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman >> wrote: >> >>> >>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I ask >>> people to rate these; >>> >>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9 >>> >>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread and >>> we >>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller adjustments, >>> colors, >>> fonts and relative placements. >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> -- >>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java >>