polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: Logo Contest
Date Mon, 31 Jul 2017 04:49:11 GMT
I have tried to make myself an opinion... not easy.

But, I would like to see

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879468/63_3.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879296/63_3.png

with the RED color. Possibly a little bit "thicker" when used on white back
ground.

And I think the Black for text works.



On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Georg Ragaller <qi4j@dev.ragaller.org>
wrote:

> If we declare the designer of #63 & #83 as winner, then I personally would
> prefer #83, because the logo part is more eye-catching for me.
>
> Cheers,
> Georg
>
>
> Am 27. Juli 2017 01:57:58 MESZ schrieb Niclas Hedhman <hedhman@gmail.com>:
> >Ok, good to know that people agree with a responsive designer.
> >
> >I think I simply declare her winner (so she get paid) and then I'll
> >request
> >a few more variants and post those on Jira and discuss further there...
> >
> >Ok?
> >
> >Niclas
> >
> >
> >On Jul 27, 2017 06:03, "Sandro Martini" <sandro.martini@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >Hi all,
> >I prefer too 63 and 83 even because I'm not sure that 40 on a light
> >background would be so good (and hadn't enough time to try myself) ...
> >
> >Even for me a more reactive designer is an important point.
> >
> >So what do you think on a second poll only with our top Logos ?
> >And maybe we could write somewhere some plus and doubts on anyone of
> >them ?
> >
> >Bye,
> >Sandro
> >
> >Il 26/Lug/2017 20:27, "Stanislav Muhametsin" <
> >stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> ha scritto:
> >
> >I think eager designer is very strong argument as well.
> >Personally, I liked #70 and #78 most (unfortunately didn't have time to
> >vote).
> >However, #63 is also very good - I think it will suit its job well. :)
> >
> >
> >On 26/07/2017 20:09, Paul Merlin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> tl;dr: I prefer #63 (and #83)
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah, both #40 and #63 are very close to the finish line.
> >> But the vote was somewhat useful by making these two stand out.
> >>
> >> Personally, I have a preference with the simplicity of #63 (and #83).
> >>
> >> I don't know how the gradients on #40 would render stitched.
> >> Something else is bothering me with #40, a friend of mine saw a very
> >> sexual picture in it and I can't remove it from my head now :)
> >>
> >> Also, a willing designer is a strong argument to me.
> >>
> >> My 2 cents
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 2017-07-26 16:38, Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> >>
> >>> I hereby declare the poll concluded.
> >>>
> >>> Most votes;  #40
> >>> Most 5 star; #40
> >>> Highest average; #63
> >>>
> >>> I call that somewhat inconclusive.
> >>>
> >>> Personally, I can accept either one. In general, the designer of #63
> >(and
> >>> #83, which I personally like better) is very eager, and submitted a
> >lot
> >of
> >>> designs and variations, more so than anyone else. Definitely ready
> >to
> >take
> >>> on alterations whatever we ask for... The designer of #40 has been
> >much
> >>> more "quiet", submitted this and one other. No follow-ups at all.
> >>>
> >>> What does others think?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Niclas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman
> ><niclas@hedhman.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There is not that many votes cast, and those who hasn't, please do
> >so,
> >>>> because the result is somewhat inconclusive.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman
> ><niclas@hedhman.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have picked 8 of the ones that I think are good enough, and I
> >ask
> >>>>> people to rate these;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/tglnh9
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let us run this for 2-3 days, and then I will pick up the thread
> >and we
> >>>>> discuss the more popular ones, for things like smaller
> >adjustments,
> >>>>> colors,
> >>>>> fonts and relative placements.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >>>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >>>> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>



-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message